Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch)
Head-to-head API pricing and cost comparison between Anthropic’s Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen’s Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch). Prices auto-refresh daily from OpenRouter.
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) is 50% cheaper for input tokens; Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) also wins on output tokens.
Side-by-side comparison
| Spec | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 | Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) |
|---|---|---|
| Input price (per 1M) | $5.00 | $2.50 |
| Cached input (per 1M) | $0.50 | $0.50 |
| Output price (per 1M) | $25.00 | $6.25 |
| Batch input (per 1M) | $2.50 | — |
| Batch output (per 1M) | $12.50 | — |
| Reasoning price (per 1M) | — | — |
| Context window | 1000K | 1010K |
| Vision support | Yes | No |
| Caching support | Yes | Yes |
| Batch API | Yes | No |
| Reasoning capability | No | No |
Monthly cost at volume
Estimated monthly API spend at common production traffic levels (input/output tokens per request shown).
| Volume | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 | Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
1K req/day 500in / 200out tokens | $225.00 | $75.00 | $150.00 Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) wins |
10K req/day 1500in / 500out tokens | $6,000 | $2,063 | $3,938 Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) wins |
100K req/day 3000in / 800out tokens | $105,000 | $37,500 | $67,500 Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) wins |
1M req/day 8000in / 2000out tokens | $2,700,000 | $975,000 | $1,725,000 Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) wins |
Adjust input/output token counts, request volume, batch & cached pricing.
Related comparisons
- Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch)Compare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch)Compare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch)Compare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch)Compare pricing →
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 or Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch)?
For input tokens, Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) is roughly 50% cheaper at $2.50/1M vs $5.00/1M. For output tokens, Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) wins at $6.25/1M. Real-world cost depends on your input/output ratio — use the calculator to model your actual workload.
What’s the context window difference?
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 has a context window of 1000K tokens. Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) offers 1010K tokens. Larger context windows are valuable for long documents, RAG pipelines, and multi-turn conversations — but they come with higher input-token bills if you fill them every request.
Should I use Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 or Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch)?
Choose Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 if you’re already on the Anthropic stack, want broad ecosystem support, or prefer its feature set. Choose Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (batch) for Qwen’s ecosystem, or its cheaper input tokens. Run a small benchmark on your own prompts before committing — price is only one axis.
How are these prices kept current?
Prices are pulled directly from OpenRouter’s public models API once every 24 hours via a Convex cron job, then normalized to per-1M-token figures. Last refresh: Aug 29, 2026.