Live pricing — last refreshed Apr 21, 2026

Cohere: Command R+ (08-2024) vs Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Head-to-head API pricing and cost comparison between Cohere’s Cohere: Command R+ (08-2024) and Google’s Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image). Prices auto-refresh daily from OpenRouter.

Verdict

Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is 88% cheaper for input tokens; Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) also wins on output tokens.

Side-by-side comparison

SpecCohere: Command R+ (08-2024)Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
Input price (per 1M)$2.50$0.30
Cached input (per 1M)$0.03
Output price (per 1M)$10.00$2.50
Batch input (per 1M)
Batch output (per 1M)
Reasoning price (per 1M)$2.50
Context window128K33K
Vision supportNoYes
Caching supportNoYes
Batch APINoNo
Reasoning capabilityNoYes

Monthly cost at volume

Estimated monthly API spend at common production traffic levels (input/output tokens per request shown).

VolumeCohere: Command R+ (08-2024)Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Savings
1K req/day
500in / 200out tokens
$97.50$19.50$78.00
Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) wins
10K req/day
1500in / 500out tokens
$2,625$510.00$2,115
Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) wins
100K req/day
3000in / 800out tokens
$46,500$8,700$37,800
Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) wins
1M req/day
8000in / 2000out tokens
$1,200,000$222,000$978,000
Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) wins
Open in interactive calculator →

Adjust input/output token counts, request volume, batch & cached pricing.

Related comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Cohere: Command R+ (08-2024) or Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)?

For input tokens, Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is roughly 88% cheaper at $0.30/1M vs $2.50/1M. For output tokens, Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) wins at $2.50/1M. Real-world cost depends on your input/output ratio — use the calculator to model your actual workload.

What’s the context window difference?

Cohere: Command R+ (08-2024) has a context window of 128K tokens. Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) offers 33K tokens. Larger context windows are valuable for long documents, RAG pipelines, and multi-turn conversations — but they come with higher input-token bills if you fill them every request.

Should I use Cohere: Command R+ (08-2024) or Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)?

Choose Cohere: Command R+ (08-2024) if you’re already on the Cohere stack, want broad ecosystem support, or prefer its feature set. Choose Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) for Google’s ecosystem, native vision input, or its cheaper input tokens. Run a small benchmark on your own prompts before committing — price is only one axis.

How are these prices kept current?

Prices are pulled directly from OpenRouter’s public models API once every 24 hours via a Convex cron job, then normalized to per-1M-token figures. Last refresh: Apr 21, 2026.