Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite vs Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5
Head-to-head API pricing and cost comparison between Google’s Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite and Anthropic’s Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5. Prices auto-refresh daily from OpenRouter.
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite is 93% cheaper for input tokens; Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite also wins on output tokens.
Side-by-side comparison
| Spec | Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite | Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price (per 1M) | $0.07 | $1.00 |
| Cached input (per 1M) | — | $0.10 |
| Output price (per 1M) | $0.30 | $5.00 |
| Batch input (per 1M) | — | $0.50 |
| Batch output (per 1M) | — | $2.50 |
| Reasoning price (per 1M) | $0.30 | — |
| Context window | 1049K | 200K |
| Vision support | Yes | Yes |
| Caching support | No | Yes |
| Batch API | No | Yes |
| Reasoning capability | Yes | No |
Monthly cost at volume
Estimated monthly API spend at common production traffic levels (input/output tokens per request shown).
| Volume | Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite | Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
1K req/day 500in / 200out tokens | $2.92 | $45.00 | $42.08 Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite wins |
10K req/day 1500in / 500out tokens | $78.75 | $1,200 | $1,121 Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite wins |
100K req/day 3000in / 800out tokens | $1,395 | $21,000 | $19,605 Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite wins |
1M req/day 8000in / 2000out tokens | $36,000 | $540,000 | $504,000 Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite wins |
Adjust input/output token counts, request volume, batch & cached pricing.
Related comparisons
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash LiteCompare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash LiteCompare pricing →
- Cohere: Command R (08-2024) vs Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash LiteCompare pricing →
- Cohere: Command R+ (08-2024) vs Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash LiteCompare pricing →
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite or Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5?
For input tokens, Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite is roughly 93% cheaper at $0.07/1M vs $1.00/1M. For output tokens, Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite wins at $0.30/1M. Real-world cost depends on your input/output ratio — use the calculator to model your actual workload.
What’s the context window difference?
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite has a context window of 1049K tokens. Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 offers 200K tokens. Larger context windows are valuable for long documents, RAG pipelines, and multi-turn conversations — but they come with higher input-token bills if you fill them every request.
Should I use Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite or Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5?
Choose Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite if you’re already on the Google stack, want reasoning capabilities, or prefer its lower input price. Choose Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 for Anthropic’s ecosystem, native vision input, or its differentiated capabilities. Run a small benchmark on your own prompts before committing — price is only one axis.
How are these prices kept current?
Prices are pulled directly from OpenRouter’s public models API once every 24 hours via a Convex cron job, then normalized to per-1M-token figures. Last refresh: Apr 21, 2026.