Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs xAI: Grok 4
Head-to-head API pricing and cost comparison between Google’s Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and xAI’s xAI: Grok 4. Prices auto-refresh daily from OpenRouter.
Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is 90% cheaper for input tokens; Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) also wins on output tokens.
Side-by-side comparison
| Spec | Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) | xAI: Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price (per 1M) | $0.30 | $3.00 |
| Cached input (per 1M) | $0.03 | $0.75 |
| Output price (per 1M) | $2.50 | $15.00 |
| Batch input (per 1M) | — | — |
| Batch output (per 1M) | — | — |
| Reasoning price (per 1M) | $2.50 | — |
| Context window | 33K | 256K |
| Vision support | Yes | Yes |
| Caching support | Yes | Yes |
| Batch API | No | No |
| Reasoning capability | Yes | No |
Monthly cost at volume
Estimated monthly API spend at common production traffic levels (input/output tokens per request shown).
| Volume | Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) | xAI: Grok 4 | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
1K req/day 500in / 200out tokens | $19.50 | $135.00 | $115.50 Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) wins |
10K req/day 1500in / 500out tokens | $510.00 | $3,600 | $3,090 Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) wins |
100K req/day 3000in / 800out tokens | $8,700 | $63,000 | $54,300 Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) wins |
1M req/day 8000in / 2000out tokens | $222,000 | $1,620,000 | $1,398,000 Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) wins |
Adjust input/output token counts, request volume, batch & cached pricing.
Related comparisons
- Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Compare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Compare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Compare pricing →
- Cohere: Command R (08-2024) vs Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Compare pricing →
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or xAI: Grok 4?
For input tokens, Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is roughly 90% cheaper at $0.30/1M vs $3.00/1M. For output tokens, Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) wins at $2.50/1M. Real-world cost depends on your input/output ratio — use the calculator to model your actual workload.
What’s the context window difference?
Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) has a context window of 33K tokens. xAI: Grok 4 offers 256K tokens. Larger context windows are valuable for long documents, RAG pipelines, and multi-turn conversations — but they come with higher input-token bills if you fill them every request.
Should I use Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or xAI: Grok 4?
Choose Google: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) if you’re already on the Google stack, want reasoning capabilities, or prefer its lower input price. Choose xAI: Grok 4 for xAI’s ecosystem, native vision input, or its differentiated capabilities. Run a small benchmark on your own prompts before committing — price is only one axis.
How are these prices kept current?
Prices are pulled directly from OpenRouter’s public models API once every 24 hours via a Convex cron job, then normalized to per-1M-token figures. Last refresh: Apr 21, 2026.