Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Head-to-head API pricing and cost comparison between Google’s Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Qwen’s Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. Prices auto-refresh daily from OpenRouter.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 40% cheaper for input tokens; Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview wins on output tokens at $3.00/1M.
Side-by-side comparison
| Spec | Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price (per 1M) | $0.50 | $0.30 |
| Cached input (per 1M) | $0.05 | $0.10 |
| Output price (per 1M) | $3.00 | $3.00 |
| Batch input (per 1M) | — | — |
| Batch output (per 1M) | — | — |
| Reasoning price (per 1M) | $3.00 | — |
| Context window | 1049K | 262K |
| Vision support | Yes | No |
| Caching support | Yes | No |
| Batch API | No | No |
| Reasoning capability | Yes | Yes |
Monthly cost at volume
Estimated monthly API spend at common production traffic levels (input/output tokens per request shown).
| Volume | Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
1K req/day 500in / 200out tokens | $25.50 | $22.50 | $3.00 Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins |
10K req/day 1500in / 500out tokens | $675.00 | $585.00 | $90.00 Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins |
100K req/day 3000in / 800out tokens | $11,700 | $9,900 | $1,800 Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins |
1M req/day 8000in / 2000out tokens | $300,000 | $252,000 | $48,000 Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins |
Adjust input/output token counts, request volume, batch & cached pricing.
Related comparisons
- Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google: Gemini 3 Flash PreviewCompare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3 Flash PreviewCompare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Google: Gemini 3 Flash PreviewCompare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3 Flash PreviewCompare pricing →
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?
For input tokens, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is roughly 40% cheaper at $0.30/1M vs $0.50/1M. For output tokens, Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview wins at $3.00/1M. Real-world cost depends on your input/output ratio — use the calculator to model your actual workload.
What’s the context window difference?
Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview has a context window of 1049K tokens. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 offers 262K tokens. Larger context windows are valuable for long documents, RAG pipelines, and multi-turn conversations — but they come with higher input-token bills if you fill them every request.
Should I use Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?
Choose Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview if you’re already on the Google stack, want reasoning capabilities, or prefer its feature set. Choose Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for Qwen’s ecosystem, or its cheaper input tokens. Run a small benchmark on your own prompts before committing — price is only one axis.
How are these prices kept current?
Prices are pulled directly from OpenRouter’s public models API once every 24 hours via a Convex cron job, then normalized to per-1M-token figures. Last refresh: Jul 29, 2026.