Live pricing — last refreshed May 28, 2026

Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) vs Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Head-to-head API pricing and cost comparison between Google’s Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) and Qwen’s Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. Prices auto-refresh daily from OpenRouter.

Verdict

Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is 95% cheaper for input tokens; Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking also wins on output tokens.

Side-by-side comparison

SpecGoogle: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview)Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input price (per 1M)$2.00$0.10
Cached input (per 1M)$0.20
Output price (per 1M)$12.00$0.78
Batch input (per 1M)
Batch output (per 1M)
Reasoning price (per 1M)$12.00
Context window66K262K
Vision supportYesNo
Caching supportYesNo
Batch APINoNo
Reasoning capabilityYesYes

Monthly cost at volume

Estimated monthly API spend at common production traffic levels (input/output tokens per request shown).

VolumeGoogle: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview)Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingSavings
1K req/day
500in / 200out tokens
$102.00$6.14$95.86
Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking wins
10K req/day
1500in / 500out tokens
$2,700$160.88$2,539
Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking wins
100K req/day
3000in / 800out tokens
$46,800$2,750$44,051
Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking wins
1M req/day
8000in / 2000out tokens
$1,200,000$70,200$1,129,800
Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking wins
Open in interactive calculator →

Adjust input/output token counts, request volume, batch & cached pricing.

Related comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) or Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

For input tokens, Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is roughly 95% cheaper at $0.10/1M vs $2.00/1M. For output tokens, Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking wins at $0.78/1M. Real-world cost depends on your input/output ratio — use the calculator to model your actual workload.

What’s the context window difference?

Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) has a context window of 66K tokens. Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking offers 262K tokens. Larger context windows are valuable for long documents, RAG pipelines, and multi-turn conversations — but they come with higher input-token bills if you fill them every request.

Should I use Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) or Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Choose Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) if you’re already on the Google stack, want reasoning capabilities, or prefer its feature set. Choose Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking for Qwen’s ecosystem, or its cheaper input tokens. Run a small benchmark on your own prompts before committing — price is only one axis.

How are these prices kept current?

Prices are pulled directly from OpenRouter’s public models API once every 24 hours via a Convex cron job, then normalized to per-1M-token figures. Last refresh: May 28, 2026.

Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview) vs Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: API Pricing & Cost Comparison | PopularAiTools.ai | PopularAiTools.ai