Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) vs Meta: Llama 4 Maverick
Head-to-head API pricing and cost comparison between Google’s Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) and Meta’s Meta: Llama 4 Maverick. Prices auto-refresh daily from OpenRouter.
Meta: Llama 4 Maverick is 83% cheaper for input tokens; Meta: Llama 4 Maverick also wins on output tokens.
Side-by-side comparison
| Spec | Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) | Meta: Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Input price (per 1M) | $2.00 | $0.35 |
| Cached input (per 1M) | $0.20 | $0.17 |
| Output price (per 1M) | $12.00 | $1.00 |
| Batch input (per 1M) | — | — |
| Batch output (per 1M) | — | — |
| Reasoning price (per 1M) | $12.00 | — |
| Context window | 131K | 524K |
| Vision support | Yes | Yes |
| Caching support | Yes | Yes |
| Batch API | No | No |
| Reasoning capability | Yes | No |
Monthly cost at volume
Estimated monthly API spend at common production traffic levels (input/output tokens per request shown).
| Volume | Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) | Meta: Llama 4 Maverick | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
1K req/day 500in / 200out tokens | $102.00 | $11.25 | $90.75 Meta: Llama 4 Maverick wins |
10K req/day 1500in / 500out tokens | $2,700 | $307.50 | $2,393 Meta: Llama 4 Maverick wins |
100K req/day 3000in / 800out tokens | $46,800 | $5,550 | $41,250 Meta: Llama 4 Maverick wins |
1M req/day 8000in / 2000out tokens | $1,200,000 | $144,000 | $1,056,000 Meta: Llama 4 Maverick wins |
Adjust input/output token counts, request volume, batch & cached pricing.
Related comparisons
- Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)Compare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)Compare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)Compare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)Compare pricing →
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) or Meta: Llama 4 Maverick?
For input tokens, Meta: Llama 4 Maverick is roughly 83% cheaper at $0.35/1M vs $2.00/1M. For output tokens, Meta: Llama 4 Maverick wins at $1.00/1M. Real-world cost depends on your input/output ratio — use the calculator to model your actual workload.
What’s the context window difference?
Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) has a context window of 131K tokens. Meta: Llama 4 Maverick offers 524K tokens. Larger context windows are valuable for long documents, RAG pipelines, and multi-turn conversations — but they come with higher input-token bills if you fill them every request.
Should I use Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) or Meta: Llama 4 Maverick?
Choose Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) if you’re already on the Google stack, want reasoning capabilities, or prefer its feature set. Choose Meta: Llama 4 Maverick for Meta’s ecosystem, native vision input, or its cheaper input tokens. Run a small benchmark on your own prompts before committing — price is only one axis.
How are these prices kept current?
Prices are pulled directly from OpenRouter’s public models API once every 24 hours via a Convex cron job, then normalized to per-1M-token figures. Last refresh: Nov 9, 2026.