Live pricing — last refreshed Apr 21, 2026

Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) vs xAI: Grok 4

Head-to-head API pricing and cost comparison between Google’s Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and xAI’s xAI: Grok 4. Prices auto-refresh daily from OpenRouter.

Verdict

Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) is 83% cheaper for input tokens; Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) also wins on output tokens.

Side-by-side comparison

SpecGoogle: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)xAI: Grok 4
Input price (per 1M)$0.50$3.00
Cached input (per 1M)$0.75
Output price (per 1M)$3.00$15.00
Batch input (per 1M)
Batch output (per 1M)
Reasoning price (per 1M)
Context window66K256K
Vision supportYesYes
Caching supportNoYes
Batch APINoNo
Reasoning capabilityNoNo

Monthly cost at volume

Estimated monthly API spend at common production traffic levels (input/output tokens per request shown).

VolumeGoogle: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)xAI: Grok 4Savings
1K req/day
500in / 200out tokens
$25.50$135.00$109.50
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) wins
10K req/day
1500in / 500out tokens
$675.00$3,600$2,925
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) wins
100K req/day
3000in / 800out tokens
$11,700$63,000$51,300
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) wins
1M req/day
8000in / 2000out tokens
$300,000$1,620,000$1,320,000
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) wins
Open in interactive calculator →

Adjust input/output token counts, request volume, batch & cached pricing.

Related comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) or xAI: Grok 4?

For input tokens, Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) is roughly 83% cheaper at $0.50/1M vs $3.00/1M. For output tokens, Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) wins at $3.00/1M. Real-world cost depends on your input/output ratio — use the calculator to model your actual workload.

What’s the context window difference?

Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) has a context window of 66K tokens. xAI: Grok 4 offers 256K tokens. Larger context windows are valuable for long documents, RAG pipelines, and multi-turn conversations — but they come with higher input-token bills if you fill them every request.

Should I use Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) or xAI: Grok 4?

Choose Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) if you’re already on the Google stack, want broad ecosystem support, or prefer its lower input price. Choose xAI: Grok 4 for xAI’s ecosystem, native vision input, or its differentiated capabilities. Run a small benchmark on your own prompts before committing — price is only one axis.

How are these prices kept current?

Prices are pulled directly from OpenRouter’s public models API once every 24 hours via a Convex cron job, then normalized to per-1M-token figures. Last refresh: Apr 21, 2026.