Live pricing — last refreshed Jul 1, 2026

Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs xAI: Grok 4.20

Head-to-head API pricing and cost comparison between Google’s Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and xAI’s xAI: Grok 4.20. Prices auto-refresh daily from OpenRouter.

Verdict

Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is 80% cheaper for input tokens; Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) also wins on output tokens.

Side-by-side comparison

SpecGoogle: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)xAI: Grok 4.20
Input price (per 1M)$0.25$1.25
Cached input (per 1M)$0.20
Output price (per 1M)$1.50$2.50
Batch input (per 1M)
Batch output (per 1M)
Reasoning price (per 1M)
Context window66K2000K
Vision supportYesYes
Caching supportNoYes
Batch APINoNo
Reasoning capabilityNoNo

Monthly cost at volume

Estimated monthly API spend at common production traffic levels (input/output tokens per request shown).

VolumeGoogle: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)xAI: Grok 4.20Savings
1K req/day
500in / 200out tokens
$12.75$33.75$21.00
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) wins
10K req/day
1500in / 500out tokens
$337.50$937.50$600.00
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) wins
100K req/day
3000in / 800out tokens
$5,850$17,250$11,400
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) wins
1M req/day
8000in / 2000out tokens
$150,000$450,000$300,000
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) wins
Open in interactive calculator →

Adjust input/output token counts, request volume, batch & cached pricing.

Related comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or xAI: Grok 4.20?

For input tokens, Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is roughly 80% cheaper at $0.25/1M vs $1.25/1M. For output tokens, Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) wins at $1.50/1M. Real-world cost depends on your input/output ratio — use the calculator to model your actual workload.

What’s the context window difference?

Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) has a context window of 66K tokens. xAI: Grok 4.20 offers 2000K tokens. Larger context windows are valuable for long documents, RAG pipelines, and multi-turn conversations — but they come with higher input-token bills if you fill them every request.

Should I use Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or xAI: Grok 4.20?

Choose Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) if you’re already on the Google stack, want broad ecosystem support, or prefer its lower input price. Choose xAI: Grok 4.20 for xAI’s ecosystem, native vision input, or its differentiated capabilities. Run a small benchmark on your own prompts before committing — price is only one axis.

How are these prices kept current?

Prices are pulled directly from OpenRouter’s public models API once every 24 hours via a Convex cron job, then normalized to per-1M-token figures. Last refresh: Jul 1, 2026.