Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs OpenAI: GPT-4o
Head-to-head API pricing and cost comparison between Google’s Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash and OpenAI’s OpenAI: GPT-4o. Prices auto-refresh daily from OpenRouter.
Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash is 85% cheaper for input tokens; Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash also wins on output tokens.
Side-by-side comparison
| Spec | Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash | OpenAI: GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Input price (per 1M) | $0.38 | $2.50 |
| Cached input (per 1M) | $0.04 | $1.25 |
| Output price (per 1M) | $1.88 | $10.00 |
| Batch input (per 1M) | — | $1.25 |
| Batch output (per 1M) | — | $5.00 |
| Reasoning price (per 1M) | $1.88 | — |
| Context window | 1049K | 128K |
| Vision support | Yes | Yes |
| Caching support | Yes | Yes |
| Batch API | No | Yes |
| Reasoning capability | Yes | No |
Monthly cost at volume
Estimated monthly API spend at common production traffic levels (input/output tokens per request shown).
| Volume | Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash | OpenAI: GPT-4o | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
1K req/day 500in / 200out tokens | $16.88 | $97.50 | $80.63 Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash wins |
10K req/day 1500in / 500out tokens | $450.00 | $2,625 | $2,175 Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash wins |
100K req/day 3000in / 800out tokens | $7,875 | $46,500 | $38,625 Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash wins |
1M req/day 8000in / 2000out tokens | $202,500 | $1,200,000 | $997,500 Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash wins |
Adjust input/output token counts, request volume, batch & cached pricing.
Related comparisons
- Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google: Gemini 3.7 FlashCompare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.7 FlashCompare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Google: Gemini 3.7 FlashCompare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.7 FlashCompare pricing →
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash or OpenAI: GPT-4o?
For input tokens, Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash is roughly 85% cheaper at $0.38/1M vs $2.50/1M. For output tokens, Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash wins at $1.88/1M. Real-world cost depends on your input/output ratio — use the calculator to model your actual workload.
What’s the context window difference?
Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash has a context window of 1049K tokens. OpenAI: GPT-4o offers 128K tokens. Larger context windows are valuable for long documents, RAG pipelines, and multi-turn conversations — but they come with higher input-token bills if you fill them every request.
Should I use Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash or OpenAI: GPT-4o?
Choose Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash if you’re already on the Google stack, want reasoning capabilities, or prefer its lower input price. Choose OpenAI: GPT-4o for OpenAI’s ecosystem, native vision input, or its differentiated capabilities. Run a small benchmark on your own prompts before committing — price is only one axis.
How are these prices kept current?
Prices are pulled directly from OpenRouter’s public models API once every 24 hours via a Convex cron job, then normalized to per-1M-token figures. Last refresh: Aug 14, 2026.