Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini (batch)
Head-to-head API pricing and cost comparison between Meta’s Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and OpenAI’s OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini (batch). Prices auto-refresh daily from OpenRouter.
OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini (batch) is 25% cheaper for input tokens; OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini (batch) also wins on output tokens.
Side-by-side comparison
| Spec | Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct | OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini (batch) |
|---|---|---|
| Input price (per 1M) | $0.10 | $0.07 |
| Cached input (per 1M) | $0.29 | $0.04 |
| Output price (per 1M) | $0.32 | $0.30 |
| Batch input (per 1M) | — | $0.04 |
| Batch output (per 1M) | — | $0.15 |
| Reasoning price (per 1M) | — | — |
| Context window | 131K | 128K |
| Vision support | No | Yes |
| Caching support | No | Yes |
| Batch API | No | Yes |
| Reasoning capability | No | No |
Monthly cost at volume
Estimated monthly API spend at common production traffic levels (input/output tokens per request shown).
| Volume | Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct | OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini (batch) | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
1K req/day 500in / 200out tokens | $3.42 | $2.92 | $0.50 OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini (batch) wins |
10K req/day 1500in / 500out tokens | $93.00 | $78.75 | $14.25 OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini (batch) wins |
100K req/day 3000in / 800out tokens | $1,668 | $1,395 | $273.00 OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini (batch) wins |
1M req/day 8000in / 2000out tokens | $43,200 | $36,000 | $7,200 OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini (batch) wins |
Adjust input/output token counts, request volume, batch & cached pricing.
Related comparisons
- Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Meta: Llama 3.3 70B InstructCompare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Meta: Llama 3.3 70B InstructCompare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Meta: Llama 3.3 70B InstructCompare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs Meta: Llama 3.3 70B InstructCompare pricing →
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini (batch)?
For input tokens, OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini (batch) is roughly 25% cheaper at $0.07/1M vs $0.10/1M. For output tokens, OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini (batch) wins at $0.30/1M. Real-world cost depends on your input/output ratio — use the calculator to model your actual workload.
What’s the context window difference?
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a context window of 131K tokens. OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini (batch) offers 128K tokens. Larger context windows are valuable for long documents, RAG pipelines, and multi-turn conversations — but they come with higher input-token bills if you fill them every request.
Should I use Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini (batch)?
Choose Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct if you’re already on the Meta stack, want broad ecosystem support, or prefer its feature set. Choose OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini (batch) for OpenAI’s ecosystem, native vision input, or its cheaper input tokens. Run a small benchmark on your own prompts before committing — price is only one axis.
How are these prices kept current?
Prices are pulled directly from OpenRouter’s public models API once every 24 hours via a Convex cron job, then normalized to per-1M-token figures. Last refresh: Oct 21, 2026.