Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Head-to-head API pricing and cost comparison between Meta’s Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen’s Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. Prices auto-refresh daily from OpenRouter.
Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is 2% cheaper for input tokens; Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins on output tokens at $0.32/1M.
Side-by-side comparison
| Spec | Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct | Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Input price (per 1M) | $0.10 | $0.10 |
| Cached input (per 1M) | — | — |
| Output price (per 1M) | $0.32 | $0.78 |
| Batch input (per 1M) | — | — |
| Batch output (per 1M) | — | — |
| Reasoning price (per 1M) | — | — |
| Context window | 131K | 262K |
| Vision support | No | No |
| Caching support | No | No |
| Batch API | No | No |
| Reasoning capability | No | Yes |
Monthly cost at volume
Estimated monthly API spend at common production traffic levels (input/output tokens per request shown).
| Volume | Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct | Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
1K req/day 500in / 200out tokens | $3.42 | $6.14 | $2.72 Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins |
10K req/day 1500in / 500out tokens | $93.00 | $160.88 | $67.88 Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins |
100K req/day 3000in / 800out tokens | $1,668 | $2,750 | $1,082 Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins |
1M req/day 8000in / 2000out tokens | $43,200 | $70,200 | $27,000 Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins |
Adjust input/output token counts, request volume, batch & cached pricing.
Related comparisons
- Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Meta: Llama 3.3 70B InstructCompare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Meta: Llama 3.3 70B InstructCompare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) vs Meta: Llama 3.3 70B InstructCompare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Meta: Llama 3.3 70B InstructCompare pricing →
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
For input tokens, Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is roughly 2% cheaper at $0.10/1M vs $0.10/1M. For output tokens, Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins at $0.32/1M. Real-world cost depends on your input/output ratio — use the calculator to model your actual workload.
What’s the context window difference?
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a context window of 131K tokens. Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking offers 262K tokens. Larger context windows are valuable for long documents, RAG pipelines, and multi-turn conversations — but they come with higher input-token bills if you fill them every request.
Should I use Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
Choose Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct if you’re already on the Meta stack, want broad ecosystem support, or prefer its lower output price. Choose Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking for Qwen’s ecosystem, or its cheaper input tokens. Run a small benchmark on your own prompts before committing — price is only one axis.
How are these prices kept current?
Prices are pulled directly from OpenRouter’s public models API once every 24 hours via a Convex cron job, then normalized to per-1M-token figures. Last refresh: May 28, 2026.