Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Head-to-head API pricing and cost comparison between Meta’s Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen’s Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15. Prices auto-refresh daily from OpenRouter.
Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is 63% cheaper for input tokens; Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins on output tokens at $0.71/1M.
Side-by-side comparison
| Spec | Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct | Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price (per 1M) | $0.71 | $0.26 |
| Cached input (per 1M) | $0.71 | — |
| Output price (per 1M) | $0.71 | $1.56 |
| Batch input (per 1M) | — | — |
| Batch output (per 1M) | — | — |
| Reasoning price (per 1M) | — | — |
| Context window | 131K | 1000K |
| Vision support | No | Yes |
| Caching support | Yes | No |
| Batch API | No | No |
| Reasoning capability | No | No |
Monthly cost at volume
Estimated monthly API spend at common production traffic levels (input/output tokens per request shown).
| Volume | Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct | Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
1K req/day 500in / 200out tokens | $14.91 | $13.26 | $1.65 Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 wins |
10K req/day 1500in / 500out tokens | $426.00 | $351.00 | $75.00 Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 wins |
100K req/day 3000in / 800out tokens | $8,094 | $6,084 | $2,010 Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 wins |
1M req/day 8000in / 2000out tokens | $213,000 | $156,000 | $57,000 Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 wins |
Adjust input/output token counts, request volume, batch & cached pricing.
Related comparisons
- Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Meta: Llama 3.3 70B InstructCompare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Meta: Llama 3.3 70B InstructCompare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Meta: Llama 3.3 70B InstructCompare pricing →
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs Meta: Llama 3.3 70B InstructCompare pricing →
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?
For input tokens, Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is roughly 63% cheaper at $0.26/1M vs $0.71/1M. For output tokens, Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins at $0.71/1M. Real-world cost depends on your input/output ratio — use the calculator to model your actual workload.
What’s the context window difference?
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a context window of 131K tokens. Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 offers 1000K tokens. Larger context windows are valuable for long documents, RAG pipelines, and multi-turn conversations — but they come with higher input-token bills if you fill them every request.
Should I use Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?
Choose Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct if you’re already on the Meta stack, want broad ecosystem support, or prefer its lower output price. Choose Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 for Qwen’s ecosystem, native vision input, or its cheaper input tokens. Run a small benchmark on your own prompts before committing — price is only one axis.
How are these prices kept current?
Prices are pulled directly from OpenRouter’s public models API once every 24 hours via a Convex cron job, then normalized to per-1M-token figures. Last refresh: Nov 10, 2026.